The Five Level Leadership among deans of comprehensive universities

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 Shahid Beheshti University

2 Shahid Rajaei University

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the Five Level Academic Leadership among deans in comprehensive universities located in Tehran . A random sample of 13 deans and 150 faculty members of ShahidBeheshtiUniversity and TarbiatModarresUniversity participated in this survey study. Data were collected by two instruments. The first one was the 5th Level Leadership questionnaires developed by the. The second one was a standardized questionnaire which developed by Ramsden to measure effective academic leadership. Results showed that deans had personality traits of 5th level leaders whereas they didn’t have professional traits of leaders at the same level. The relation between personality traits and professional traits was found to be significant. From faculty members' point of view, deans associated with the 5th level leadership were found to be more effective than others.

Keywords


Brungardt, L. Curtis (2003). The new face of leadership: Implications for higher education leadership studies. FortHays: FortHays state University (DonaldClarkCenter)
Chamberlain, Loaur (2006). The Lost art of leadership. Woman Today Magazines, www.womentodaymagazine.com
Day, Christopher (2004). The Passion of successful leadership. School Leadership & Management, 24 (4), pp. 425-437.
 Dubmer, L.S. et al. (2001). Case study of Characteristics of effective leadership in graduate student collaborative work. Education Journal, TexasTech.University, 124 (4), pp. 721-726.
Osseo-Asare, E. et al. (2005). Leadership best practices for sustaining quality in UK higher education from the perspective of the EFQM Excellence Model. Quality Assurance in Education, 13 (2), pp. 148-170.
Gordon, G. (2002). The roles of leadership and ownership in building an effective quality culture. Quality in Higher Education, 8 (1), pp. 97-106.
Hoppe, L. S. (2003). Identifying and nurturing potential academic leaders. Identifying and Preparing Academic, No. 124, pp. 15-24.
Martin, Judith L. (1993). Academic deans: An analysis of effective academic leadership at research universities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, pp. 1-42.
McCarthy, D. & Royes (1987). Organizational model of governance: Academic deans, decision making styles. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (5), pp. 2-8.
Pounder, S. J. (2001). New leadership and university organizational effectiveness: Exploring the relationship. Leadership and Organization Department Journal, 22 (6), pp. 281- 290.
Taylor, F. (2002). Quality in higher education. Strathclyde University, Center for Academic Practices, 8 (1) www.JimCallins.com
Yielder, T. & Codling, A. (2004). Management and leadership in the contemporary university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, UNITEC Institute of Technology, New Zealand, 26 (3), pp. 315-330.