An Analysis of the Effective Factors in Students' Academic Decisions with a Cognitive Approach (Case Study: Tehran University Students)

Naderi, Abolghasem; Geraeinejad, Gholamreza; Khodaei, Ebrahim; Keykha, Ahmad

doi:10.48308/mpes.2024.234452.1422

An Analysis of the Effective Factors in Students' Academic Decisions with a Cognitive Approach (Case Study: Tehran University Students)

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

¹ Professor of Economics of Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Central Brach, Tehran, Iran

³ Professor of Assessment and Research, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

⁴ Postdoctoral Researcher at Sharif University of Technology, Sharif Policy Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

10.48308/mpes.2024.234452.1422

Abstract

d Ahmad Keykha^*
Abstract
Objectives: Students make many academic decisions during their academic careers, and these decisions are influenced by many internal and external factors. These decisions have significant consequences on their future education, careers, and personal lives. Knowing the reasons behind academic decisions could help improve students' academic success. Additionally, it has helped universities and higher education institutions achieve their goals, thus promoting the development of higher education. Another important point is the method of analyzing students' academic decisions with classical, neoclassical, behavioral, and cognitive approaches. Each of these approaches has a specific look at decision-making based on the evolution of the newest and most complete cognitive approach. Therefore, the analysis of students' academic decisions with a cognitive approach would lead to more noteworthy achievements. Based on this, the purpose of this study is to categorize and prioritize the effective factors in students' academic decisions with a cognitive approach. To achieve this goal, two questions were designed; (a) According to the cognitive decision-making model, what components do students' academic decisions include? (b) Which component of the cognitive decision-making model has more weight and priority in the academic decisions of Tehran University students?
Materials and Methods: This research was conducted in two stages. In the first stage the qualitative content analysis method of 50 graduate students from fourteen faculties at Tehran University who had made academic decisions during the period (2016-2021) using the purposeful random sampling method was applied. The purposeful selection of samples is based on statistical analysis. We conducted interviews with these selected students. To analyze the data, specifically, the three-step approach of Elo and Kyngäs (2008) has been used. Based on this approach, the first step is choosing the unit of analysis and understanding and insight from the entire data. The second stage was organizing and the third stage was reporting the results. In addition, we used a cognitive decision-making framework (Naderi, 2013). This framework was the basis for designing interview questions and categorizing content analysis results. The mentioned framework had 9 components in different layers. In the second part, we prioritized educational decisions using Shannon's entropy analytical technique. Academic decisions in this research include the decision to leave, remove a semester, change fields, transfer, and drop out.
Discussion and Conclusions: In general, we identified 9 categories, 21 subcategories, and 600 key concepts. These components encompass thoughts and perceptions (personal thoughts and perceptions); preferences (personal preferences/preferences and non-personal preferences/preferences); values and emotions (individual values and emotions and impersonal values and emotions); environment and conditions (scientific environment (university) and social and cultural conditions); information and knowledge (personal information knowledge and non-personal information knowledge); risk and uncertainty (risk and ambiguity in conditions); institutions and governments (university level, higher education level, education level, government level, and military service level); consequences and results (individual consequences and results, non-individual consequences and results) and opportunities (individual opportunities and non-individual opportunities). Based on the weighting of these components, the most important ones are information and knowledge and risk and uncertainty. Essentially, we categorized and analyzed the extracted concepts based on the cognitive decision-making model. In the end, based on the research findings, policy proposals were presented to decision-makers in higher education at two levels (micro and macro). Among the micro-level suggestions, we can mention the diversification of the financial aid and student loan systems to prevent students with lower economic levels from dropping out with timely measures. At the macro level, it is also possible to mention the proposal to develop the relationship between universities and industry and improve the labor market situation of graduates to prevent them from deciding to emigrate by creating more job opportunities for students in addition to their individual growth.

Keywords

References

Ahmad, S., Karimzadegan, D., & Kheirati Kazeroni, T. (2014). Data Mining of Students Withdrawal at University of Tehran, focusing on Fee Paid Students (to prevent customer churn). Journal of Information Technology Management, 7 (2) [in Persian]

Ahmadi, A., Khairatikazerooni, T (2019). Data mining withdrawal of the students of Payme Noor University in Tehran state to increase student retention rate (Preventing customer rejection), Quarterly Journal of Management of Governmental Organizations, 7(2): 47-58 [in Persian]

Asayesh, M., Qazinejad, N & Bahonar, F. (2021). Explanation of the Emotional Reactions of Girls with Love Trauma Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. The Women and Families Cultural-Educational Journal, 15(53): 125-154 [in Persian]

Ashouri, M., Vahedi, Sh, Adib, Y & Badri, R (2021). Discovering the experience of failing university entrance exam among applicants: A grounded theory study. Journal of Psychological Sciences, 19(96): 1593-1606. [in Persian]

Behroozi, N (2023). The Investigation of the Relationship between Fear of Covid 19 and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Psychological Hardiness and Social Support. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 30(1): 37-58. [in Persian].

Cannon, C., Goldsmith, K., & Roux, C. (2019). A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1): 104–127

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1): 107-115

Eskandari, F, Shahi, S & Parsa, A (2012). Game theory and its application in managers’ decision making. International Conference on Management Challenges and Solutions [in Persian]

Firgiawan, W., Zulkarnaim, N., & Cokrowibowo, S. (2020). A Comparative Study using SAW, TOPSIS, SAW-AHP, and TOPSIS-AHP for Tuition Fee (UKT). In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing

Ghashghaee, Gh, Hoseinsabet, F & Motamedi, A. (2021). Investigating the relationship between psychological capital and anxiety of female students of Allameh Tabatabai University. Journal of Psychological Research in Management, 6(2): 97-109 [in Persian]

Goldasteh, A., Sohrabi, M & Azar, M. (2022). Investigating Factors Affecting Students’ Decision to Change of Major in Master’s Degree, Journal of Higher Education Letter, 15(59): 60-78 [in Persian]

Kaushal, V., Jaiswal, D., Kant, R., & Ali, N. (2021). Determinants of university reputation: conceptual model and empirical investigation in an emerging higher education market. International Journal of Emerging Markets,2

Kehm, B. M., Larsen, M. R., & Sommersel, H. B. (2019). Student dropout from universities in Europe: A review of empirical literature. Hungarian. Educational Research Journal, 9(2): 147-164

King-Dominguez, A. A., Amestica-Rivas, L., Gonzalez, V. R., & Contreras, F. G. (2023). Student dropout, the economic cost for Chilean universities. Universidad Ciencia y Tecnología, 27(118), 17-28

Laufer, M., & Gorup, M. (2019). The invisible others: Stories of international doctoral student dropout. Higher Education, 78(1): 165-181

Mahjoub Ishratabadi, H. (2018). Decision making with cognitive-neural approach. Tehran, Publications: National Defense University and Higher Research Institute [in Persian]

Malekjafariyan, R. (2012). Examining theories related to the decision making process and strategy selection. Monthly social, economic, scientific and cultural work and society, 162 [in Persian]

Malekpour Afshar, R., Haghdoost, A., Dehnavieh, R., Sheikhzadeh, R., Mousavi, M., Rezaei, P., Seljooghi, R., Maki, M & Nouri Hekmat, S (2022). Causes and Solutions of the Brain Drain in Iran, Journal of Culture and health promotion (Academy of Medical Sciences of Islamic Republic of Iran, 6(1): 81-87[in Persian]

Marade, A. A., & Brinthaupt, T. M. (2018). Good and bad reasons for changing a college major: A comparison of student and faculty views. Education, 138(4): 323-336.

Maroufi, Y., Adak, M (2018). Represent of the lived experience of postgraduate students of education with respect to the change of major; a phenomenological study. Journal of Measuring and Educational Evaluation Studies, 7(20): 33-55 [in Persia]

Mehdi, R, Darabi, F & Keykha, A. (2023). Analysis of the Damages of Students’ Dormitory Life Using a Phenomenological Approach (Case Study: Allameh Tabatabai University), Journal of Teaching in Marine Sciences, 10(1): 172-187. [in Persian]

Menbari, M., Pooshaneh, K & Khosravibabadi, A. (2023). identify the factors affecting the diagnosis of the educational guidance system in order to provide a strategic model. Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership & Administration, 16(4) [in Persian]

Moslehshirazi, A, Namazi, M., Mohammadi, A & Rajabi, A (2012). Perspective theory and modeling of the decision-making pattern of managers in the industrial sector, Industrial Management Vision Quarterly, 3(2): 9 [in Persian]

Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Naderi, A (2012). Cognitive economics: a new approach to explain economic decisions, Planning and Budgeting Quarterly, 18(121): 99-125. [in Persian]

Naderi, A., Khodaei, E, Geraeinejad, Gh & Keykha, A. (2023). Exploring the Role of Tuition on Students’ Academic Decisions: a Meta-Synthesis Study, Journal of Measuring and Educational Evaluation Studies, 13(43): 88-118 [in Persian]

Omona, J. (2013). Sampling in qualitative research: Improving the quality of research outcomes in higher education. Makerere Journal of Higher Education, 4(2): 169-185

Pakgohar, A., Khalili, M. (2021). Investigation of sample size in qualitative sampling methods, Journal of the Popularization of Science, 12(20): 270-297[in Persian]

Pirzahi, A., Behravan, H (2014). Sociological Factors Influencing the Academic Motivation of Students Studying at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2): 23-56[in Persian]

Prihandoko, L. A., Djatmika, D., & Nurkamto, J. (2022, February). Complexities of online thesis supervision during the Covid-19 pandemic: EFL lecturers’ perceptions. In 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021) (pp. 262-269). Atlantis Press

Qazi, Z., Qazi, W., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2022). The antecedents affecting university reputation and student satisfaction: a study in higher education context. Corporate Reputation Review, 25(4): 253-271.

Ravanshad, Y., Azarfar, A., Makarm, A., Emadzade, A., Golsorkhi, M & Ravanshad, S (2020). Study the causes for Canceling Education in residents of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 63(2) [in Persian] n

Rezaian, S, Kharrazi, K., Jamali, E & Naderi, A (2019). A Conceptual Model of Cognitive Decision Making. Advances in Cognitive Science, 21(1): 1-20 [in Persian] n

Sahoo, A. K., Mishra, N., Jain, M., Sahoo, M., Ghoshal, P., Sahoo, A. K., ... & Ghoshal, P. (2023). Problems and solutions to conduct of thesis of postgraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: an insight into the students’ perspective. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 35(1): 55-70

Shariatmadar, A., Emadi, F & Kalantar Hormozi, A. (2021). Study of the Role of Family Factors in the Return Anxiety of Female Students Living in a Dormitory. Journal of Applied Psycology Research, 12(3): 37-57. [in Persian] n

Tabesh, F., Zare, H. (2013). The effect of training emotional intelligence skills on rational, intuitive, avoidant, dependent and spontaneous decision making styles. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 6(4): 323 [in Persian] n

Toopshekan, M., Naghsh & Javaheri Mohammadi, A (2021). Phenomenological Study by Students Tendency Irrelevant to Study in the Fields of Psychology and Counseling. Journal of Applied Psycology Research, 12(2): 139-157 [in Persian] n

Torkamani, M. (2018). Structural relationships between Maternal and Paternal Warmth with Hope in Girl Students, JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 3(2): 1-11 [in Persian].

Wilson, R. A., & Keil, F. C. (2001). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press

Yorulmaz, M., & Aydoğdu, A. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on higher education: A bibliometric study on published theses. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 5 (1): 638-648

Zhao, J., & Tomm, B. M. (2018). Psychological responses to scarcity. In Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press