ارزیابی سیاست وزارت علوم در ایجاد فرصت مطالعاتی اجباری ارتباط با صنعت از منظر نهادی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی ، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

چکیده

هدف: ارتباط بین دانشگاه و صنعت و تأثیرات متقابل آن‌ها بر فرایندهای نوآوری، از دیرباز در جوامع علمی مختلف مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرارگرفته است. اهمیت این ارتباط باعث شده که در برخی از اسناد بالادستی نظام جمهوری اسلامی ایران نیز اشاراتی هرچند دور به آن شود. در این راستا یکی از مهم‌ترین گام‌ها، سیاست اخیر وزارت علوم در خصوص گذراندن فرصت مطالعاتی اجباری ارتباط با صنعت برای اعضای هیئت‌علمی تازه استخدام‌شده در مراکز آموزش عالی و پژوهشگاه‌های کشور است. براین اساس، پژوهش حاضر بر آن بود تا با تکیه‌بر دیدگاه نهادی به ارزیابی سیاست اخیر وزارت علوم در خصوص گذراندن فرصت مطالعاتی اجباری ارتباط با صنعت بپردازد.  
مواد و روش‌ها: بدین منظور از رویکرد کیفی از نوع پدیدارشناسی تفسیری استفاده شد. در همین راستا، تعداد 17 نفر از اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه‌ها و پژوهشگاه‌های کشور که مشمولِ این سیاست بودند، به‌عنوان ذینفعان با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از نوع موارد مطلوب و با توجه به اشباع نظری در داده‌ها مورد مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند قرار گرفتند. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل مصاحبه‌ها نیز از روش تحلیل محتوای کلایزی و برای بررسی اعتبار یافته‌های پژوهش از روش بازبینی مشارکت‌کنندگان در مصاحبه‌ها استفاده شد. 
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های حاصل از تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش نشان داد که سیاست ارتباط با صنعت گرفتارِ مسائلی چون مشروع نبودن، اجباری بودن، همخوان بودن با منافع سیاست‌گذاران، نادیده گرفتن تفاوت‌های رشته‌ای، نادیده گرفتن شرایط اقتصادی، اجتماعی و سیاسی است که این مسائل نشان از آن داشت که این سیاست بر پایه سیاست اتخاذشده در نهادهای اُلیگارشی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Policy of the Ministry of Science in Creating Compulsory Sabbatical to Relation with Industry based on an Institutional Perspective

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Nazarzadeh Zare 1
  • Shirkoh Mohammadi 2
  • Saeid Norollahee 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Semnan, Semnan, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student in Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Bu-Ali Sina, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objectives: The relationship between university and industry and consequently their effects on innovation processes have long been analyzed in various scientific communities. The importance of this connection has caused some of the documents of the Islamic Republic of Iran to refer to it. Accordingly, one of the most important steps in the recent policy of the Ministry of Science of Iran doing the compulsory sabbatical is related to the industry for newly recruited faculty members in higher education organizations and research institutes. Thus, the present study tried to explain the recent policy of the Ministry of Science, based on an institutional perspective.
Materials and Methods: To achieve this, 17 faculty members of universities and research institutes in Iran who were faced with this policy, as main beneficiaries by intensity case sampling method and according to the theoretical saturation of the data were selected. The tool of the study was a semi-structured interview. To analyze the interviews, the Colaizzi content analysis was applied and to examine the validity of the research findings, the member-checking method was used.
Discussion and Conclusions: The findings of the analysis showed that the policy about the industry has faced some issues such as illegitimacy, coercion, consistency with the interests of policymakers, ignoring disciplinary differences, and ignoring economic, sociology, and policy conditions. These issues indicate that the policy is based on the policy created in the oligarchic institutions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Relationship between University and Industry
  • Faculty Members
  • Evaluating Policy
  • Inclusive Institution
  • Oligarchy Institution
  • Ministry of Science

مراجع

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2019). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Translated by Mohsen Mirdamadi, Mohammad Hossein Naeimipour and Seyed Alireza Beheshti Shirazi. Tehran: Rozaneh. [In Persian].n
Akhavanhezaveh, F., Edjtehadi, M., Mohammaddavoodi, A., Mohamadkhani, K. (2021). Identifying and Explaining the Dimensions and Components of Creating a Role for the Board of Trustees in Funding the University and its Improvement. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 14(1), 129-156. [In Persian].
Alibekova, A, Tleppayev, T., Medeni, D., & Ruzanov, R. (2019). Determinants of technology commercialization ecosystem for universities in Kazakhstan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 271-279.
Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31, 387-408.
Bagherinejad, J. (2008). University- Industry Relationship System for Technology Development in Iran: Mechanisms and Policy implications. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 1(1), 1-14. [In Persian].
Berthod, O. (2018). Institutional theory of organizations. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Ali Farazmand. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Bertoletti, A., & Johnes, G. (2021). Efciency in university‑industry collaboration: an analysis of UK higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 126, 7679–7714.
Comprehensive Scientific Map of Iran. (2011). Tehran: Council of the Cultural Revolution. [In Persian].
Demain, A.L. (2001). The Relationship between Universities and Industry: The American University Perspective. Food technol. Biotechnol, 39 (3), 157–160.
D’Este, P., & P. Patel. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
Diefenbach, T. (2019). Why Michels’ ‘iron law of oligarchy’ is not an iron law – and how democratic organisations can stay ‘oligarchy-free’. Organization Studies, 40, 545 - 562.
Etzkowitz, H. (2019). Is Silicon Valley a global model or unique anomaly? Industry and  Higher Education, 33(2), 83-95.
Faez, A., & Shahabi, A. (2011). Evaluate and prioritize barriers to university-industry communication (Semnan city case study). Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 4(2), 97-124. [In Persian].
Frasquet, M., Caldero´n, H., & Cervera, A. (2012). University–industry collaboration from relationship marketing perspective: an empirical analysis in a Spanish University. High Educ, 64, 85–98.
Geisler E., Rubenstein A.H. (1989). University—Industry Relations: A Review of Major Issues. In: Link A.N., Tassey G. (eds) Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry—University—Government Relationship. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2522-9_3
Ghareche, M., Parishani, A., Eivazinezhad, S., Mirzaei, N. (2020). The exploratory pattern of promoting the university-industry relationship. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 11(43), 1-20. [In Persian].
Ghoraishi Khorasgani, M., Janavi, E., Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2021). Explaining the Phenomenon of Scientific Formalism in Iran’s Academic System: Factors and Solutions. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 14(2), 51-66. [In Persian].
Guimón, J. (2013). Promoting University-Industry Collaboration in Developing Countries. The Innovation Policy Platform, 1–10. file:///C:/Users/Valieasr/Downloads/PromotingUniversityIndustryCollaborationInDevelopingCountries.pdf
Jowkar, T., & Morovati, M. (2016).Triple helix of University-Industry Government in the Scientific Articles of Iran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 8(3), 71-84. [In Persian].
Madahian, Sh., ManzariTavakoli, A., & Salajegheh, S. (2017). Barriers in Interaction between Industry and Universities of Medical Sciences in Iran. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 6(2), 214-227. [In Persian].
Mertens, D.M. (2015). Research and Evaluation in Educational and Psychology. Ed (4) United State of America: Sage Publication.
Mikhailov, A., Puffal, D. & Santini, S. (2020). University-Industry Relations and Industrial Innovation: Evidence from Brazil. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 15(3), 6-15.
Mohammadi, Sh. (2020). Explaining the school management based on scientific metaphor or personal experience? A case study on the management approach of successful school principals. Journal of School Administration, 8(3), 95-121. [In Persian].
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (2018). Method for Sabbatical of Faculty Members of Universities and Research Institutes in Society and Industry. [In Persian].
Mondragon Lievana, C. (2010). The Relationship between Industry and Universities. Cuadernos de Estudios Empresariales, 20(1), 85-105.5
Panarina, E. (2015). University-industry Partnership as a Key Strategy for Innovative Sustainable Economic Growth. Journal of international business research, 1, 24-27.
Perkmann, M., and K. Walsh. (2007). “University-Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews .9 (4), 259
Plewa, C., & Quester, P. (2007). Key drivers of university–industry relationships: the role of organizational compatibility and personal experience. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(5), 370-382.
Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J. and Siegel, D.S. (2002). Universities and fundamental research: reflections on the growth of university–industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 10–21.
Pfeffer, J. (2010). Power: Why some people have it and others don’t. Harper business.
Randel, A.E., Galvin, B.M., Shore, L., Ehrhart, K., Chung, B.G., Dean, M., & Kedharnath, U. (2017). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28, 190-203.
Rikap, C., & Harari-Kermadec, H. (2019): Motivations for collaborating with industry: has public policy influenced new academics in Argentina? Studies in Higher Education, 1, 1-11.
Salimi, J., Ghasemi, M., Abdi, A. (2019). Emerging Challenges in Iranian Higher Education and Presenting a Conceptual Model; the study of grounded theory. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 12(2), 127-156.  [In Persian].
Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9, 41 - 42.
Sobhani, F., Ebrahimi, S., & Jowkar A. (2017). Scientific interactions between university, industry and government in the field of agriculture in Iran: based on Triple Helix Model. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 23 (3), 21-41. [In Persian].n 
Turk-Bicakci, L., & Brint, S. (2005). University–industry collaboration: Patterns of growth for low and middle level performers. Higher Education, 49, 61–89
Tzavidas, E., Enevoldsen, P. & Xydis, G. (2020). A University-industry knowledge transfer online education approach via a cloud-based database global solution. Smart Learn. Environ. 7, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00128-5
Vélez-Rolón, A.M., Méndez-Pinzón, M., & Acevedo, O.L. (2020). Open Innovation Community for University–Industry Knowledge Transfer: A Colombian Case. Journal of Technology Market and Complex. 6(181), 1-17.
Weckowska, D, M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41-42, 62–74.
Yarmohammadian, M., Davidson, P., & Yeh, CH. (2018). Sabbatical as a part of the academic excellence journey: A narrative qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7(119), 1-14.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار