بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر روش تخصیص منابع آموزش عالی در ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

3 استادیار دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز

4 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر الگوی تخصیص منابع آموزش‌عالی در ایران است. برای این منظور شاخص‌های کلیدی تخصیص منابع آموزش‌عالی در سه گروه مؤلفه‌های سیاسی، عملکردی و رویکردی طبقه‌بندی شدند. پرسش‌نامه‌ی طراحی شده بر مبنای شاخص‌های مؤثر بر الگوی تخصیص ‌منابع، میان مدیران و کارشناسان ‌ارشد دانشگاه‌ها و سازمان برنامه و بودجه‌ی کشور، توزیع و داده‌های مورد نیاز برای بررسی و تحلیل شاخص‌های تخصیص منابع در وضعیت موجود و بهینه گردآوری شد. روش پژوهش به‌لحاظ نحوه‌ی گردآوری اطلاعات از نوع آمیخته (کمی و کیفی) می‌باشد. براساس یافته‌های پژوهش، ایجاد تغییر و ارتقای الگوی تخصیص‌ منابع‌ آموزش‌ عالی، مستلزم توجه بیشتر و عمیق‌تر به مؤلفه عملکردی و در نظر گرفتن اهمیت مؤلفه رویکردی است. نتایج آزمون فرضیه‌ها در وضعیت موجود نشان می‌دهد، الگوی تخصیص منابع به دانشگاه‌ها تحت تأثیر مؤلفه‌ها‌ی عملکردی و سیاسی قرار دارد در صورتی که در وضعیت بهینه الگوی تخصیص منابع آموزش‌عالی تحت تأثیر مؤلفه‌های عملکردی و رویکردی قرار می‌گیرد و مؤلفه سیاسی بر الگوی تخصیص منابع آموزش ‌عالی تأثیری ندارد.
براساس یافته‌های پژوهش، مهم‌ترین شاخص‌های مؤثر بر الگوی تخصیص منابع آموزش عالی به شرح ذیل شناسایی شدند: "تحقق اهداف آموزشی برنامه‌ی راهبردی دانشگاه"، "تحقق اهداف پژوهشی برنامه راهبردی دانشگاه"، "اثربخشی فعالیت‌های آموزشی"، "هزینه‌یابی بر مبنای فعالیت در دانشگاه"، "منزلت و اعتبار دانشگاه"، "فرآیند مدیریت اثربخش و شفاف در دانشگاه‌ها"، "قابلیت پیش‌بینی روش و پارامترهای مورد استفاده تخصیص منابع" و هم‌چنین "شفافیت، عدالت و کارآمدی تخصیص منابع".

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Factors Affecting the Methods of Higher Education Resource Allocation in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fariba Khaleghi Soroush 1
  • Mahmoud Abolghasemi 2
  • Gholamreza Geraeinejad 3
  • Maryam Davallou 4
1 PhD student in Higher Education Management, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
4 Assistant Professor, School of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

The purpose of the present study is to identify the components of the method of the higher education resource allocation in Iran. For this purpose, key indicators of resource allocation were extracted and categorized into three groups of political, functional and approach-based ones. The designed questionnaire was compiled based on effective indicators on resource allocation method, among managers and experts in universities, as well as the affairs of higher education of program and budget organization of the country, distribution and needed data to study and the analysis of resource allocation indices to universities in the present and also optimal situation. The effectiveness amount of the indices was evaluated using an analytical method. Based on research findings, making change and achieving an optimal resource allocation model requires more and deeper attention to the functional component and consideration of the importance of the approach-based component. Some of the most important indicators that affect the optimal allocation of resources to universities are as follows: "realization of educational objectives of the strategic plan of the university", "realization of research objectives of the strategic plan of the university", "effectiveness of educational activities", "cost-based activities in the university", "University dignity and credibility," "effective and transparent management process at universities," "possibility of predicting methods and parameters used for resource allocation," as well as "transparency, justice and resource allocation efficiency". The results of the research show that the political component does not affect the optimal method of resources allocation to universities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resources allocation
  • Higher education
  • Iran
  • university

مراجع

CHEPS, (2010). Progresses in higher education reform across Europe – funding reform, download: http://ec.europa.eu/education/news/news2259_en.htm.
Darling, A.L., M.D., Lang, D.W., Lopers R. (1989). Autonomy and control, a university funding formula as an instrument of public policy, Higher Education, 18,559-583.
Davari, Ali (2013). Modeling of Structural Equations with P.L.S. Software, Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi.
Deputy of Strategic Planning and Supervision of the President (2011). The Budget Law of 2011 for the Entire Country, Single Article of Large Tables of Resources and Consumption, Tehran: Higher Institute of Management and Planning Education and Research. Data and Notification Center.
Deputy of Strategic Planning and Supervision of the President (2012). The Budget Law of 2012 for the Entire Country, Single Article of Large Tables of Resources and Consumption, Tehran: Higher Institute of Management and Planning Education and Research.
Deputy of Strategic Planning and Supervision of the President (2013). The Budget Law of 2013 for the Entire Country, Single Article of Large Tables of Resources and Consumption, Tehran: Higher Institute of Management and Planning Education and Research.
Deputy of Strategic Planning and Supervision of the President (2010). The Budget Law of 2010 for the Entire Country, Single Article of Large Tables of Resources and Consumption, Tehran: Higher Institute of Management and Planning Education and Research. Data and Notification Center.
Eaton, Judith (2015). An Overview of U.S. Accreditiation, The Council for Higher Education Accreditation, Washington DC, Retrieved from:ttps://www.chea.org/userfiles/uploads/Overview%20of%20US%20Accreditation%202015.pdf
Ecker, Brigitte, Leitner, Karl-Heinz, Steind, Claudia (2011). Funding formulas for teaching in public universities: International experiences and lessons drawn from a science policy view, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH. Retrieved from: www.eua.be/ Libraries/ funding-forum/ EUA_Ecker_article_ web. pdf?sfvrsn=0
Eurydice (2008). Higher Education Governance in Europe. Policies, structures funding and academic staff, Eurydice, Brussels, Retrieved from: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/091EN.pdf
HEFCE (2016). Guide to funding 2016-17: How HEFCE allocates its funds, website: www.hefce.ac.uk
Herbst, M. (2007). Financing Public Universities. Higher Education Dynamics, 18, springer.
Hicks, D. (2010). Overview of Models of Performance-Based Research Funding Systems, oecd document, download: http:// www.oecd.org/ officialdocuments/ publicdisplaydocu mentpdf/? cote=dsti/stp/rihr (2010)4&doclanguage=en.
Jongbloed, B. & Koelman, J. (2000). Vouchers for higher education? A survey of the literature, Study commissioned by the Hong Kong University Grants Committee, Enschede: Retrieved from: CHEPS. https:// www.eurashe.eu/ about/partners/cheps/.
Jongbloed, B. (2004). Regulation and competition in higher education, Markets in Higher Education. Rhetoric or Reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jongbloed, B. (2008). Funding higher education: a view from Europe, prepared for the seminar: Funding Higher Education: A Comparative Overview organised by the National Trade Confederation of Goods, Services and Tourism (CNC). Brasilia, Brazil.
Jongbloed, B.W.A. & Vossensteyn, J. (2001). Keeping up Performances: an international survey of performance based funding in higher education. Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(2), 127-145.
Khaki, Gholamreza (2011). Research Methodology with Thesis Writing Approach, Tehran: Baztab.
Khorshidi, Gholamhossein (2004). An Introduction on Economy of Higher Education. Tehran: Padideh.
Kuo, Jenn-shyong and Yi-cheng HO. (2008). The cost Efficiency Impact of the University Operation Fund on Public universities in Taiwan, Economics of Education Review, 27, 603-612.
Lopez, M.J.G (2006). Towards decentralized and goal oriented models of institutional resource allocation: The Spanish case, Higher Education, (51), 589-617.
Massen, P. (2000). Models of Financing Higher Education in Europe, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS) University of Twente, Retrieved from https://www.utwente.nl/en/bms/cheps/about-us/team/#professorate
OECD, (2016). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Paris, 206-281. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/
Orr, D. (2005). Can Performace-Based Funding and Quality Assurance Solve State vs, Market Conundrum? Higher Education Policy, 18.
Praneviciene B, Puraite A. (2010). The Financing Methods of Higher Education System, Jurisprudence, 4(122), 335–356.
Salmi, J., Hauptman, A.M. (2006). Innovations in Tertiary Education Financing: A comparative evaluation of allocation mechanisms, Education working paper series, 4, Washington, the World Bank.
Smith, P. (2003). Formula Funding of Public Services: An economic analysis, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 301-322.
 Teixeira P.N., D.B. Johnstone, M.J. Rosa and J.J. Vossensteyn (2006). Cost-sharing and accessibility in higher education: A fairer deal? Higher Education Dynamics, Dordrecht: Springer.
The Law Collection of the Fourth Five-Year Plan of Economic, Social and Cultural Development (2004). Tehran: Research Deputy Printing and Publishing Office, Compilation and Revision of Laws and Regulations.
The Law Collection of the Fourth Five-Year Plan of Economic, Social and Cultural Development (2010). Tehran: Research Deputy Printing and Publishing Office, Compilation and Revision of Laws and Regulations.
Woods, M (2008). The Theory, History and Practice of Resource Allocation Models in UK Universities, Finance and Management in Colleges and Universities.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار