The Duties and Roles of Education Officials and School Principals in Strengthening and developing work engagement among Teachers: the Results of a Mixed Research

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 Instructor, Department of Education, Payame-Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: The present research has been conducted with the aim of identifying the duties and roles of educational officials and school principals in strengthening and developing work engagement among teachers and evaluating the present status of khoramabad schools.
Materials and methods: This study is a practical research concerning its purpose and methodologically it is a mixed research of explanatory sequential design, which is at first qualitative and then quantitative. The research population of the qualitative section are some famous, experienced and excellent teachers and Principals, who according to parents' and administrators' report can be regarded as engaged in their work. They were chosen by using purposeful and snow-ball sampling and they were interviewed. In quantitative section, research population includes all principals and teachers of the primary educational period (first and second period) and secondary educational period (first and second period) of khoramabad city in the educational year 2016-2017. The number of the sample was 340 of the teachers of different educational periods of khoramabad city, who were selected using stratified random sampling method based on Cochran's formula, and they were examined with researcher-made questionnaire of work engagement. The content validity of the questionnaire was approved by professors and experts in this field and its reliability was authentic (Cronbach's alpha above 0.8). For the analysis of literary texts and interviews open coding method was used in order to formulate teachers' work engagement indices in the qualitative section; and for the statistical analysis of quantitative data, confirmatory factor analysis and T-test (single - sample t) analysis method was used.
Results and discussion: the findings of the qualitative section of the study indicate that teachers' work engagement include 18 indicators and 5 dimensions: stimulating teachers, performance evaluation procedures, creation of opportunities to enhance learning, democratic management style, school atmosphere. In the qualitative section, confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the measurement model of latent variable has good fit with observed data. In the quantitative section, According to the results of one-sample t-test, the five factors of the duties and roles of educational officials and school principals in strengthening and developing work engagement among teachers were evaluated as moderate and meaningful. Teachers' work engagement is a complex and multi-dimensional concept that is under the influence of different factors and it needs more identification and investigation.

Keywords

References

Abele, Khudayar (2005). The Need for Discussing the Development of Meritocracy in Organizations. Proceedings of the First National Conference of Meritocracy in Organizations, Faculty of Psychology and Education of Tehran University. (In Persian).
Arifin, F., Troena, E. A., &Djumahir, M. R. (2014). Organizational Culture, Transformational Leadership, Work Engagement and Teacher’s Performance: Test of a Model. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(1), 1-14.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., De Boer, E., &Schaufeli, W. B. (2003).Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency.Journal of vocational behavior, 62(2), 341-356.‏
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., &Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of educational psychology, 99(2), 274.‏
Bay, A. B., An, I. L., & Laguador, J. M. (2014). Organizational Satisfaction and Work Engagement of Filipino Teachers in an Asian University. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research, 2(4), 32-41.‏
Bazargan, A. (2009). An introduction of qualitative and mixed research methods. Tehran: Didar publication (In Persian).
Borup, J., Stevens, M. A., & Waters, L. H. (2015).Parent and Student Perceptions of Parent Engagement at a Cyber Charter High School.Online Learning, 19(5), 69-91.‏
Creswell,J. W& Plano Clark,V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Translated by Alireza Kiamanesh&Javid Saraei(2010). Tehran:Aeizh Publication. (In Persian).
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., &Schaufeli, W. B. (2006).Burnout and work engagement among teachers.Journal of school psychology, 43(6), 495-513.
Henkel, T. G. (2016). The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership Styles and University Adjunct Faculty Work Engagement.
Høigaard, R., Giske, R., &Sundsli, K. (2012).Newly qualified teachers’ work engagement and teacher efficacy influences on job satisfaction, burnout, and the intention to quit.European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 347-357.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, Research & Practice Translated by mir Mohamad seyed abas-zade(2017), Urmia: anzal Publication. (In Persian).
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.‏
‏Karen Seashore Louis. (2006). Organizing for school change. Routledge.‏
Keengwe, J. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of research on educational technology integration and active learning. IGI Global.
Klassen, R. M., Yerdelen, S., & Durksen, T. L. (2013). Measuring teacher engagement: development of the engaged teachers scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 33-52.
Konermann, J. (2012). Teachers' work engagement. A deeper understanding of the role of job and personal resources in relationship to work engagement, its antecedents, and its outcomes. Universiteit Twente.
Kulophas, D., Ruengtrakul, A., &Wongwanich, S. (2015). The Relationships among Authentic Leadership, Teachers’ Work Engagement, Academic Optimism and School Size as Moderator: A Conceptual Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2554-2558.‏
Runhaar, P., Sanders, K., &Konermann, J. (2013). Teachers' work engagement: Considering interaction with pupils and human resources practices as job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(10), 2017-2030.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 10-24.‏
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Torrente, P., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Teams make it work: How team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema, 24(1), 106-112.
Welch, M. (2011). The evolution of the employee engagement concept: communication implications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 328-346.‏
West, C. (2013). The 6 Keys to Teacher Engagement: Unlocking the Doors to Top Teacher Performance. Routledge.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., &Schaufeli, W. B. (2007).The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model.International journal of stress management, 14(2), 121.
Yu, S., Xu, H., & You, Y. (2015). Research on the Relation Between the Self-Leadership and Work Engagement of the Primary and Junior School Headmaster. Studies in Sociology of Science, 6(2), 17.‏

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics