تأملی در مؤلفه‌های رفتاری مدیران مدارس در تشکیل اجتماع یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان (مرور نظام‌مند)

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: اجتماع یادگیری حرفه‌ای بیانگر یک تلاش جمعی برای بهبود یادگیری دانش‌آموزان، تقویت و پایدارسازی یادگیری تمام کارکنان مدرسه، ایجاد دانش از طریق تحقیق و جستجو، تحلیل و استفاده از داده‌ها برای بهبود مستمر است. بنابراین تشکیل و توسعه آن در مدرسه به‌عنوان یکی از وظایف مدیران شناخته می‌شود. این اجتماعات خود به خود اتّفاق نمی‌افتند؛ بلکه باید مدیریت و هدایت شود و مورد حمایت واقع شوند. مدیران مدارس در تشکیل و تحقق اجتماعات یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان نقش کلیدی دارند و با توجه به آنچه به آن توجه می‌کنند، آنچه انجام می‌دهند و آنچه پاداش می‌دهند، جهت و انتظارات را برای یادگیری در مدرسه تعیین کنند. به دلیل اثربخشی این اجتماعات در تقویت یادگیری دانش‌آموزان، رشد حرفه‌ای معلمان، بهبود فرایندهای آموزشی کلاسی و ارتقای بهره‌وری و کارایی مدرسه، بررسی چگونگی نقش مدیران در تشکیل و توسعه اجتماعات یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان دارای اهمیت نظری و کاربردی است. از این رو پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی رفتارهای مدیران مدارس در تشکیل اجتماع یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان انجام شده است.
مواد و روش‌ها: این پژوهش با استفاده از روش کیفی به صورت مرور کیفی نظام‌مند انجام شده است. در این روش سعی شده است با تجزیه و تحلیل شواهد ارائه شده توسط مطالعات تجربی پیشین، درکی جامع و به‌روز از نقش مدیران مدارس و رفتارهای آن‌ها در تشکیل اجتماع یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان ایجاد شود. این پژوهش مطابق با گام‌های ارایه شده توسط رایت و همکاران (2007) انجام شده است. پس از تدوین پروتکل پژوهش، پژوهش‌های مرتبط با جستجوی کلیدواژه‌های مشخص شده به صورت نظام‌مند از میان 9 مجله پیشرو بین‌المللی در مدیریت آموزشی شناسایی و استخراج گردید. پس از غربال‌گری مقالات شناسایی شده منطبق بر معیارهای ورود و خروج، در مجموع 35 مقاله مرتبط با اهداف و پرسش‌های پژوهش انتخاب شدند. داده‌های پژوهش با ابزار چک لیست گردآوری و طبقه‌بندی و به صورت دستی توسط پژوهشگر تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. سنتز داده‌ها در سه سطح کدگذاری؛ باز، محوری و انتخابی صورت گرفته است. به‌منظور مقبولیت و اعتباریابی پژوهش از خودبازبینی محقق، بازبینی همکاران و کنترل مشارکت‌کنندگان از طریق مکاتبه الکترونیکی با نویسندگان برخی از مقالات مشمول استفاده شده است.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: مطابق با یافته‌های پژوهش، 31 کد باز (نشانگر) در کد انتخابی "رفتارهای مدیران مدارس در تشکیل اجتماع یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان" شناسایی گردید. این کدهای باز در قالب 6 مؤلفه محوری دسته‌بندی شدند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد حمایتگری (با 8 نشانگر)، انسجام‌بخشی (با 4 نشانگر)، مشارکت‌جویی (با 5 نشانگر)، ایجاد شبکه‌های توانمندساز (با 5 نشانگر)، یادگیری‌محوری (با 5 نشانگر) و پایش مستمر (با 4 نشانگر) برای تشکیل و توسعه اجتماع یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان به‌عنوان مؤلفه‌های رفتاری مدیران مدارس در تشکیل و توسعه اجتماع یادگیری حرفه‌ای معلمان هستند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد مدیران با پشتیبانی از معلمان و حمایت کردن از اجتماعات یادگیری، ایجاد هماهنگی، همسویی و انسجام در مدرسه، جلب مشارکت و همکاری همه ذی‌نفعان در مدرسه، ایجاد شبکه‌های درون و برون مدرسه‌ای توسعه حرفه‌ای در مدرسه و توانمندسازی معلمان مدرسه به صورت شبکه‌ای، محور قرار دادن یادگیری دانش‌آموزان و رشد حرفه‌ای معلمان در مدرسه به‌عنوان مرکز ثقل تمام فعالیت‌ها و برنامه‌های مدرسه و هم‌چنین نظارت و پایش مستمر فرایندها و نتایج و ارزیابی آن‌ها همراه با ارائه بازخورهای لازم، در تشکیل و تحقق اجتماعات یادگیری ایفای نقش می‌کنند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Reflection on the Behavioral Components of School Principals in the Formation of Teachers’ Professional Learning Communities (Systematic Review)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Monireh Zamani 1
  • Bijan Abdollahi 2
  • HasanReza ZeinAbadi 3
  • Abdolrahim Naveh ebrahim 3
1 Ph.D. in Educational Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The professional learning community represents a collective effort to improve students' learning, strengthen and stabilize the learning of all employees within the school, create knowledge through research and search, analysis, and use of data for continuous improvement. Therefore, its formation and development in the school are recognized as one of the duties of principals. These gatherings do not happen by themselves; rather, they should be managed and guided, and supported. School principals play a key role in the formation and realization of teachers' professional learning communities, and according to what they pay attention to, what they do and what they reward, and the tone they have, they set the direction and expectations for learning determined in school. Due to the effectiveness of these communities in strengthening students' learning, teachers' professional growth, improving classroom educational processes, and improving school productivity and efficiency, examining the role of principals in the formation and development of teachers' professional learning communities has theoretical importance. Therefore, the present study was conducted to identify the behaviors of school principals in the formation of teachers' professional learning communities.
Materials and Methods: This research was conducted using a qualitative method in the form of a systematic qualitative review. This method, it has been tried to create a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of the role of school principals and their behaviors in the formation of teachers' professional learning community by analyzing the evidence provided by previous experimental studies. This research was conducted according to the steps provided by Wright et al. (2007). After developing the research protocol, studies related to the search of specified keywords were systematically identified and extracted from 9 leading international journals in educational management. After screening the identified articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 35 articles related to the objectives and questions of the current research were selected. The research data were collected and classified by the checklist tool and manually analyzed by the researcher. Data synthesis has been done in three levels: open coding, central coding, and selective coding. To validate the research, self-review of the researcher, review of colleagues, and control of participants through electronic correspondence with the authors of some included articles have been used.
Discussion and Conclusion: According to the findings of the research, 31 open codes (indicators) were identified in the selected code "behavior and strategies of school principals in the formation of teachers' professional learning community". These open codes were categorized into 6 core components. The results of this research show supportiveness (with 8 indicators), integration (with 4 indicators), seeking cooperation (with 5 indicators), creating empowering networks (with 5 indicators), learning orientedness (with 5 indicators), and continuous monitoring (with 4 indicators) for the formation and development of teachers' professional learning community as behavioral components of school principals. The results of this research show that principals play a role in the formation and realization of learning communities by supporting teachers and learning communities, creating coordination, alignment, and cohesion in the school, attracting the participation and cooperation of all stakeholders in the school, creating networks inside and outside the school for professional development, the empowerment of the school teachers in a networked way, placing the students' learning and the professional growth of the teachers in the school as the center of gravity of all the activities and programs of the school as well as the continuous supervision and monitoring of the processes and their results and evaluation along with providing necessary feedback.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Professional Learning Community of Teachers
  • Behaviors of School Principals
  • Systematic Review of the Role of Principals
  • Behavioral Components of Principals
Admiraal, W.; Emmelot, Y.; Schenke, W.; Sligte, H. & Jong, L. d.  (2019). Schools as professional learning communities: what can schools do to support professional development of their teachers?, Professional Development in Education, 47(4),684–698 
Avidov-Ungar, O. (2018). Professional learning communities of teachers: Israeli principals’ perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration. 57 (6), 658-674
Benoliel, P. & Schechter, C. (2017). Is it personal? Teacher’s personality and the principal’s role in professional learning communities. Improving Schools, 20(3), 222-235 
Bezzina, C. (2008). Towards a learning community: The journey of a Maltese Catholic Church School. Management in Education, 22(3), 22–27 
Boom-Muilenburg, S. N.; Vries, S. d.; Veen, K.; Poortman, C. L. & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Understanding sustainable professional learning communities by considering school leaders’ interpretations and educational beliefs. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-29 
Bredeson, P. V. & Johnsson, O. (2000). The school principal's role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education. 26(2): 385-401
Carpenter, D. (2015). School culture and leadership of professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(5), 682–694
Cate, J. M.; Vaughn, C. A.; O'Hair, M. J. (2006). A 17-Year Case Study of an Elementary School's Journey: From Traditional School to Learning Community to Democratic School Community. Journal of School Leadership, 16(1), 86–111
Cheng, E. C. K. & Lee, C.K. J. (2014). Developing strategies for communities of practice. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 751–764
Cherkowski, S. (2016). Exploring the Role of the School Principal in Cultivating a Professional Learning Climate. Journal of School Leadership, 26(3), 523–543
Collinson, V. (2004). Learning to share, sharing to learn. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(3),312–332
Darling-Hammond, L.; Hyler, M. E.; Gardner, M. & Espinoza, D. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute
Dufour, R.; Dufour, R.; Eaker, R. & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service 
Garrity, S. M.; Bridi, J.; Kotas, J. & Gianzero, G. (2021). Starting Small: A Descriptive Case Study of Principal Competencies That Support the PreK-K-3 Continuum . Journal of School Leadership, 32(4),1-24
Haiyan, Q.; Allan, W. (2020). Creating conditions for professional learning communities (PLCs) in schools in China: the role of school principals. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 1–13
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher Leadership as Distributed Leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility?. School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313–324
Ho, J.; Ong, M. & Tan, L. S. (2019). Leadership of professional learning communities in Singapore schools: The tight–loose balance. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4),1-16 
Huffman, J. B.; Hipp, K. A.; Pankake, A. M. & Moller, G. (2001). Professional Learning Communities: Leadership, Purposeful Decision Making, and Job-Embedded Staff Development. Journal of School Leadership, 11(5),448-463  
Huffman, J.; Jacobson, A. (2003). Perceptions of professional learning communities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(3), 239–250
Huijboom, F.; Van, M. P.; Rusman, E. & Vermeulen, M. (2019). How to enhance teachers’ professional learning by stimulating the development of professional learning communities: operationalising a comprehensive PLC concept for assessing its development in everyday educational practice. Professional Development in Education, 46(5), 751-769
Jones, C. M. & Thessin, R. A. (2017). Sustaining Continuous Improvement through Professional Learning Communities in a Secondary School. Journal of School Leadership, 27(2), 214–241
King, F. (2011). The role of leadership in developing and sustaining teachers' professional learning. Management in Education, 25(4), 149–155
Li, L.; Hallinger, P. & Ko, J. (2016). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76–100
Little, J. W. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learningcentered school. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters. International perspectives (pp. 22–44). Routledge.
Mitchell, C. & Sackney, L. (2006). Building Schools, Building People: The School Principal's Role in Leading a Learning Community. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 627-640 
Mitchell, C. & Sackney, L. (2015). School Improvement in High-capacity Schools: Educational Leadership and Living-systems Ontology. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(5),1-16 
Murphy, J. (2015). Creating communities of professionalism: addressing cultural and structural barriers. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 154–176
Park, J. H.; Lee, I. H. & Cooc, N. (2018). The Role of School-Level Mechanisms: How Principal Support, Professional Learning Communities, Collective Responsibility, and Group-Level Teacher Expectations Affect Student Achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(5),1-39
Qiao, X.; Yu, Sh. & Zhang, L. (2017). A review of research on professional learning communities in mainland China (2006–2015). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5),1-16  
Roy, P. & Hord, Sh. M. (2006). It's Everywhere, but What is it? Professional Learning Communities. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 490–504
Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141
Stoll, L.; Mcmahon, A. & Thomas, S. (2006). Identifying and Leading Effective Professional Learning Communities. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 611–623
Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019). Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 36(3), 202-222
Thomas, J. & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45  
Thornton, K.; Cherrington, S. (2018). Professional learning communities in early childhood education: a vehicle for professional growth. Professional Development in Education, 45(3),1–15
Vanblaere, B. & Devos, G. (2017). The Role of Departmental Leadership for Professional Learning Communities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 1-30 
Vanblaere, B. & Devos, G. (2017). The Role of Departmental Leadership for Professional Learning Communities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 1-30   
Voelkel, R. H. (2019). Causal relationship among transformational leadership, professional learning communities, and teacher collective efficacy. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(3), 345-366
Voulalas, Z. D. & Sharpe, F. G. (2005). Creating schools as learning communities: obstacles and processes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(2), 187–208
Wright, R. W.; Brand, R. A.; Dunn, W. & Spindler, K. P. (2007). How to Write a Systematic Review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 455,23–29
Yazdani, Z.; Kerami, M. & Qarvone, D. (2018). Development of educational leadership: models, methods and effects of professional development of school administrators. The 6th International Conference on Research Achievements in Social Sciences, Educational Sciences and Psychology [In Persian] y
Yiu Yuen, P.; Cheong Cheng, Y. (2000). Leadership for teachers’ action learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 198–209
Youngs, P. & King, M. B. (2002). Principal Leadership for Professional Development to Build School Capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670
Zhaohui, C. & Sylvester Anning, A. (2020). Impact of teachers’ professional development on students’ academic performance in higher education. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research, 5(2)50-57