اخلاق و مسئولیت اجتماعی در برنامه درسی رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت آموزشی و توسعه منابع انسانی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی و آموزش دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

4 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، مازندران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: در این پژوهش برنامه درسی رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی از منظر اخلاق و مسئولیت اجتماعی مورد ارزیابی و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. این پژوهش دو هدف را دنبال کرده است؛ نخست بررسی جایگاه اخلاق و مسئولیت اجتماعی در برنامه درسی رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی و اهمیت دوره‌های آموزشی اخلاق و مسئولیت اجتماعی در این رشته و دیگری برجسته کردن پتانسیل رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی برای به حداقل رساندن سوء رفتارهای اخلاقی در سازمان.
مواد و روش‌ها: به لحاظ هدف، این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی بود و از لحاظ چگونگی گردآوری داده‌های مورد نیاز برای پاسخ به دو سؤال‌ پژوهدر این پژوهش از یک طرح کیفی و روش تحلیل اسناد با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه ساخت‌یافته استفاده شده است. بدین شیوه که؛ سه سند/گروه برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات انتخاب شدند: 1) برنامه درسی رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی؛ 2) دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی؛ و 3) متخصصان توسعه منابع انسانی شاغل در سازمان‌ها. برای انتخاب اسناد و شرکت‌کنندگان از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند استفاده شد.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که در برنامه درسی رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی، اخلاق و مسئولیت اجتماعی، موضوعات به حاشیه رانده شده‌ای هستند و مغفول مانده‌اند. به عبارتی، این رشته تمرکز خود را بر توسعه فردی و توسعه سازمانی معطوف کرده است. به‌رغم تأکید اندیشمندان بر نقش توسعه منابع انسانی در کمک به «توسعه افراد، سازمان‌ها، جامعه، ملت و کل بشریت» و هم‌چنین «ارتقای سازمان و توسعه اجتماعی»، برنامه درسی رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی در ایران به این مسائل نپرداخته است. براساس تحلیل اطلاعات به دست آمده از دانشجویان رشته آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی آن‌ها با موضوعاتی که مسائل اخلاقی و مسئولیت اجتماعی در سازمان را دربر داشته باشد از طریق فعالیت‌های فوق برنامه، و آموزش‌های تکمیلی در کلاس‌های درس برخورد نداشته و نسبت به این مسائل آگاه نبوده‌اند. هم‌چنین، نتایج پژوهش در نمونه سوم نشان داد که متخصصان توسعه منابع انسانی در سازمان‌ها همواره با مسائل اخلاقی و اجتماعی برخورد می‌کنند اما شیوه مداخله در این مسائل را نیاموخته‌اند. بسیاری از برنامه‌های آکادمیک توسعه منابع انسانی، فاقد راهبردی روشن برای آموزش متخصصان است، به صورتی که بتوانند با معضلات اخلاقی مقابله و با اطمینان، یک محل کار اخلاقی را مهیا کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Ethics and Social Responsibility in the Major of Human Resources Development and Training Curriculum

نویسندگان [English]

  • Aliye Mataji Nimvar 1
  • Mohammadreza Ahanchian 2
  • Morteza Karami 3
  • Ibrahim Salehi Omran 4
1 Ph.D. student in Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Educational Management and Human Resource Development, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum Studies and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
4 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,, Mazandaran University, Mazandaran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objectives: This article aims to examine and evaluate the major of the Human Resources Development and Training curriculum from the perspective of ethics and social responsibility. The purpose of this article is twofold: first, to examine the condition of ethics and social responsibility in the curriculum of Human Resources Development and Training and the importance of training courses on ethics and social responsibility in this major; and second, to highlight the potential of the major to minimize ethical misconduct in organizations.
Materials and Methods: This study is a qualitative study based on document analysis and interviews. In the article, three documents/groups were selected to gather information: 1) the curriculum of the major of Human Resources Development and Training; 2) master's students majoring in Human Resources Development and Training; and 3) Human Resources Development professionals working in organizations. 
Discussion and Conclusions: The results of the study showed that ethics and social responsibility are marginal and largely neglected in the Human Resources Development and Training curriculum. In other words, this major focuses on individual and organizational development. Although many scholars emphasize the role of human resource development in the "development of individuals, organizations, society, the nation, and all mankind" and the "improvement of the organization and social development," these issues are not addressed in the major of Human Resources Development and Training curriculum in Iran. The analysis of the information obtained from the students revealed that they did not deal with issues such as ethics and social responsibility of organizations through extracurricular activities and additional training in classrooms and they were not aware of these issues. The study of the third sample revealed that professionals of human resources development and training in the organizations were always concerned with ethical and social issues but they were not learning how to deal with these issues. Many academic human resource development programs do not have a clear strategy for training professionals to deal with ethical dilemmas and to create an ethical workplace.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ethics
  • Curriculum Evaluation
  • Major of Human Resources Development and Training
  • Social Responsibility

مراجع

Ababaf, Z. (2017). Curriculum knowledge of faculty members: Neglected professional competency in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 7(14), 103-130.
Ahmad, M., Tang, X. W., Qiu, J. N., & Ahmad, F. (2019). Interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC analysis for identifying and benchmarking significant factors of seismic soil liquefaction. Applied Sciences, 9(2), 1-21.
Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345.
Alikahni, P., RezaeiZadeh, M., & Vahidi-Asl, M. (2018). The analysis of “Fetch! Lunch Rush”as an Augmented Reality multi-player game in cooperative learning. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 13(4), 39-62.
Al‐Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133-1148.
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
Bakhshaliizade, S., Fathi Vajargah, K., Arefi, M., Kiamanesh, A. (2020). Required faculty competencies for teaching in higher education institutes in technology era. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(1), 83-100.
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15-21.
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and quantity, 36(4), 391-409.
Bokosmaty, R., Bridgeman, A., & Muir, M. (2019). Using a partially flipped learning model to teach first year undergraduate chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(4), 629-639.
Bouwmeester, R. A., de Kleijn, R. A., van den Berg, I. E., ten Cate, O. T. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Westerveld, H. E. (2019). Flipping the medical classroom: Effect on workload, interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge. Computers & Education, 139, 118-128.
Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2015). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Routledge.
Burla, L., Knierim, B., Barth, J., Liewald, K., Duetz, M., & Abel, T. (2008). From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nursing research, 57(2), 113-117.
Canelas, D. A., Hill, J. L., & Novicki, A. (2017). Cooperative learning in organic chemistry increases student assessment of learning gains in key transferable skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 441-456.
Chang, C. Y., Kao, C. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Facilitating students’ critical thinking and decision making performances: A flipped classroom for neonatal health care training. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 32-46.
Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226-239.
Chenari, Z., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Bandali, B. (2023). Designing a prototype of coaching software and measuring its usability. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 17(1), 1-22.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP nough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
 Chen, M. (2010). Education Nation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141-151.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic books.
Ghazanfari Hashemi, N., Musapour, N., & Hosseini khah, A. (2020). The nature and foundation of synergistic curriculum. Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum, 14(7), 97-148.
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-607.
Grover, R., Achleitner, H., Thomas, N., Wyatt, R., & Vowell, F. N. (1997). The wind beneath our wings: Chaos theory and the butterfly effect in curriculum design. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 38(4), 268–282.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology, 30(4), 233-252.
Hunt, I., Ryan, A., hAodha, M. Ó., & Rezaei-Zadeh, M. (2022). Industry requirements, thesis-writing and the emergence of flexible educational programmes: Reflections on the university learner experience. Industry and Higher Education, 36(3), 319-333.
Kantanen, H., Koponen, J., Sointu, E., & Valtonen, T. (2019). Including the student voice: Experiences and learning outcomes of a flipped communication course. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 82(3), 337-356.
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398-411.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach toimproving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140.
Lambropoulos, N., & Pitsou, C. (2020). Blended collaborative learning supporting pedagogy students’ reflective practice. Creative Education, 11(10), 1930-1946.
Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427-453.
Maarefvand, Z., Shams, G., Sabaghyan, Z. (2018). Investigating the learning culture of architecture students of Shahid Beheshti University (strengths and weaknesses). Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 8(21), 159-190.
Macfarlane, B. (2004). Teaching with integrity: The ethics of higher education practice. Routledge.
Mahdi, M., Yamani Duozi Sorkhabi, M., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Monadi, M. (2021). Phenomenology of educational and research inequity experiences of students based on capability approach (case study: a public university in Tehran). Iranian Journal of Educational Society, 14(2), 39-51.
Mohammadi, M., Naseri Jahromi, R., & Moeini Shahraki, H. (2013). Investigating the relationship between the effectiveness (coherence, balance and appropriateness) of the curriculum with the technical, contextual and behavioral competencies of undergraduate students in management (commercial, industrial and educational) at Shiraz University. Curriculum Research, 3 (2), 53-72.
Mojtaba_zadeh, M., abbaspour, A., makeki, H., farasatkhah, M. (2018). Accreditation and quality assurance model of Iran’s higher education system from the perspective of the experts. Journal of Research in Educational Science, 12(42), 7-24.
Munson, A., & Pierce, R. (2015). Flipping content to improve student examination performance in a pharmacogenomics course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(7), 1_7.
Nasrollahinia, F., Yamani Douzi Sorkhabi, M., Farasatkhah, M., & Rezaeizadeh, M. (2022). Identifying the factors and challenges of science production in the academic field. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 14(4), 1-31.
Notash, H., Rezaei-Zadeh, M., Elyasi, G. M., & Talebi, K. (2019). Identifying and modelling trustworthiness competencies of cluster development agents (CDAs). Journal of Enterprising Culture, 27(01), 61-91.
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. Qualitative Report, 17(56), 1-28.
Rahman, A. A., Aris, B., Mohamed, H., & Zaid, N. M. (2014). The influences of Flipped Classroom: A meta analysis. In Engineering Education (ICEED), 2014 IEEE 6th Conference on (pp. 24-28). IEEE.
RezaeiZadeh, M., Hogan, M., O’Reilly, J., Cunningham, J., & Murphy, E. (2017).Core entrepreneurial competencies and their interdependencies: insights from a study of Irish and Iranian entrepreneurs, university students and academics. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 35-73.
Rezaei-zadeh, M., Ansari, M., & Murphy, E. (2014a). Interactive management (IM) as a qualitative research methodology: An introduction. Iranian Students Booking Agency.
Rezaei-Zadeh, M., Hogan, M., O’Reilly, J., Cleary, B., & Murphy, E. (2014b). Using interactive management to identify, rank and model entrepreneurial competencies as universities’ entrepreneurship curricula. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 57-94.
Rezaei-Zadeh, M., O’Reilly, J., Hogan, M., Cleary, B., & Murphy, E. (2013). Designing a specific tool for measuring students’ and tutors’ mutual expectations from each other in an e-learning platform. In ICELW 2013 conference proceeding (pp. 1-6).
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.
Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: Emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 758-768.
Sherrow, T., Lang, B., & Corbett, R. (2016). The flipped class: Experience in a university business communication course. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79(2), 207-216.
Son, J. Y. (2016). Comparing physical, virtual, and hybrid flipped labs for general education biology. Online Learning, 20(3), 228-243.
Song, Y., & Kapur, M. (2017). How to flip the classroom- productive failure or traditional flipped classroom pedagogical design?. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 292-305.
Sushil, S. (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87-106.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70.
Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Lu, Y. J. (2015). The effects of problem-based learning with flipped classroom on elementary students’ computing skills: A case study of the production of Ebooks. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 11(2), 32-40.
Tse, W. S., Choi, L. Y., & Tang, W. S. (2019). Effects of video‐based flipped class instruction on subject reading motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 385-398.
Wang, F. H. (2019). On the relationships between behaviors and achievement in technology-mediated flipped classrooms: A two-phase online behavioral PLS-SEM model. Computers & Education, 142, 1-13. 
Wang, J., Jou, M., Lv, Y., & Huang, C. C. (2018). An investigation on teaching performances of model-based flipping classroom for physics supported by modern teaching technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 36-48.
Watson, R. H. (1978). Interpretive structural modeling: A useful tool for technology assessment?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 11(2), 165-185.
Woolfolk, A. (2017). Educational psychology. Pearson Education.
Yusefzadeh_Chowdary, M, & Shahmoradi, M. (2016). Evaluation of teaching quality based on Hénard & Roseveare model from the PhD students perspective. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences (ESMS), 9(4), 295-305.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار