A model for Improving Appointment and Promotion System of Staff and Line Managers in Education Department

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 PhD student in Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch

2 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University

Abstract

This research, entitled " A model for improving appointment and promotion system of staff and line managers in Education Department'', examines the appointment of managers with regard to the effect of educational managers on productivity in Education Department.
In terms of purpose, this study is applied and in terms of data, it is quantitative. Based on performance type, it is a descriptive survey. The statistical population consists of 103772 line managers (school principals), 7380 staff managers (principals, deputies, Bureau officials), and 958196 teachers of different programs. 400 staff and line managers in addition to 400 teachers were selected as samples of the study by random multi-stage clustering using Morgan table. A researcher-made questionnaire was used for gathering data. It includes 95 closed-response questions. The reliability of the questionnaire is calculated 0/81.For data analysis, dependent t-test, Vilkakson and Mann-Whitney U tests and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were used. The findings of this study show that there is a significant difference between the existing criteria for managers' appointment in Education Department with the desirable criteria from the view point of teachers and managers and there is a difference between the viewpoints of teachers and managers in terms of existing appointment criteria but they have similar viewpoints regarding desirable appointment criteria. According to the findings of this study, a model was proposed for the appointment and promotion of managers in Education Department.

Keywords


Bayarystanova, E., Arenova, A., & Nurmuhametova, R. (2014). Education System Management and Professional Competence of Managers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 427-431.
Ben-Shahar, T. H. (2016). Equality in Education–Why we must go all the way. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice19(1), 83-100.
Greve, P., Biemann, T., & Ruigrok, W. (2015). Foreign executive appointments: A multilevel examination. Journal of World Business50(4), 674-686.
Johnstone, D. B. (1992). The university, democracy, and the challenge to meritocracy. Interchange23(1-2), 19-23.
Ondercin, G. K. (2009). Being interim: Leading in a transitional appointment (Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University).
Pelit, A. (2015). Comparison of the models adopted regarding the training and appointment of school administrators (Turkey, France, Denmark and England sample). In Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2013 (pp. 331-342). Springer, Cham.
Sağır, M., Göksoy, S., & Ercan, O. (2014). Views of School Administrators Regarding Accreditation Implementations in Educational Inspection. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences116, 1604-1609.
Turabik, T., Baskan, G. A., & Koçak, S. (2014). Certain Developed Countries’ School Manager Training Models and in the Light of these Models Suggestions for Turkey's School Manager Training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences131, 236-243.