آسیب‌شناسی ساختاری پردیس‌های خودگردان دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 استاد دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

3 دانشیار موسسه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی

4 دانشیار دانشگاه الزهرا

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف، آسیب‌شناسی ساختاری پردیس‌های خودگردان در سه بعد (رسمیت، تمرکز و پیچیدگی) و پیامدهای بلندمدت آسیب‌ها انجام‌شده است. بدین منظور با روش نمونه‌گیری غیراحتمالی و هدفمند، با 21 نفر از صاحب‌نظران آموزش عالی و مدیران پردیس‌های خودگردان دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران مصاحبه انجام شد. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی‌-‌اکتشافی است، برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روش تحلیل مضمون استفاده شده و مضامین آسیب‌های ساختاری استخراج شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد، از مجموع 181 مورد کدگذاری؛ 27% کدهای استخراج‌شده مربوط به مقوله رسمیت، 38% مربوط به مقوله تمرکز و 30% مربوط به مقوله پیچیدگی و 5% مربوط به پیامدهای بلندمدت آسیب‌ها هستند. این امر بیانگر آن است که بیشترین آسیب‌های ساختاری پردیس‌های خودگردان مربوط به بعد تمرکز و مضامینی ازجمله: عدم تفویض اختیار و وجود تصمیم‌گیری از بالا به پایین، عدم استقلال در جذب نیرو، عدم استقلال در زمینه پذیرش دانشجو و اجرای فرآیند آموزشی و عدم استقلال مالی است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural pathology of autonomous campus of Tehran governmental universities

نویسندگان [English]

  • maryamsadat ghoraishi 1
  • Mohammad Yamani Douzi sorkhabi 2
  • Gholamreza Zaker salehi 3
  • Golnar Mehran 4
1 shahid Beheshti university
2 Professor of Shahid Beheshti University
3 Associate Professor, Research and Planning Institute
4 Associate Professor of Al-Zahra University
چکیده [English]

This paper aims to study and structural pathology of autonomous campuses at three dimensions (formality, centralization and complexity) and the long-term consequences of damages. Thus, through non-probability and purposeful sampling method, one interviews 21 experts of higher education and managers of autonomous campuses of Tehran state universities. This study is a descriptive-exploratory type. Thematic analysis method is used for structural pathology of autonomous campuses and themes were extracted. Study results showed that among 181 coding cases, 27% of extracted coded was related to formality, 38% to centralization, 30% to complexity and.5% to long-term consequences of damages. These results suggests that the greatest structural damages of autonomous campus are ascribed to centralization dimension and themes such as lack of latitude and top-down decision making, lack of independence in recruitment, lack of independence in terms of admitting students and implementing educational process and failure of financial independence.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • structural pathology
  • centralization
  • complexity
  • autonomous campus
  • formality

مراجع

Abedi Jafari, Hasan; Teslimi, Mohammad Saeed; Faghihi, Abolhassan and Sheikh Zadeh, Mohammad (2011). Thematic analysis and networking of themes. A simple and efficient way to explain patterns in qualitative data. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Management, 5 (2), 151-198.
Alaghehband, Ali (2012). Theoretical Foundations and Principles of Educational Management. Tehran: Ravan publishing house.
Altbakh, Philip G., Rioberger, Liu and Rambelli, Ligra E (2014). Global Higher Education Trends, Tracking a University Revolution. Translated by Mohammad Reza Saeed Abadi and Parvin Ahmad Khanloo, First Edition, Tehran: Publishing Institute for Research and Planning for Higher Education, 157-170.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology,Qualitative Research in Psychology,(3)2, 77-101.
Child, J. (2008). Organization structure, environment, and performance: the role of strategic choice, Sociology, (6), 1-22.
Delavari, Reza (2007). Pathology of organizational education in the public sector based on the three-ternary model. The first Pathology Conference on Organizational Education, 72.
Ellis, S & Dick.P. (2003).The 2ed Academic Revolution & the Rise of Enterpreneurial Science, Tehnology and Science, (22).
Fathi Vajargah, Koroush, Maleki, Hamid (2012). Conceptualization of the relation between the two systems of public education and higher education in selected countries of the world: a comparative approach. Management and Planning Quarterly in Educational Systems, 5 (9), 9-33.
Ferasatkhah, Maghsoud (2008). A Survey on the Status and Desirability of Assessing the Scientific System in Iran with Emphasis on Higher Education. Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology, 1 (2), 43-58.
  Ghadimi, Ismail (1392). Pathology of Higher Education in Iran. Journal of Social Sciences, 69, 19-29.
Ghoraishi khorasgani, Maryam Sadat, Yamani, Douzi Sorkhabi, Mohammad, Zaker Salehi, Gholamreza and Mehran, Golnar (2016). An analysis of studies on the privatization of higher education. Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology, 8 (1), 77-95.
Gresov, C. & Drazin, R. (2007). Equifinality: functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review, (22), 403 -428.
Hirsch, Werner and Luke A, Weber (2002). Challenges for higher education in the third millennium. Tehran: Imam Hossein University. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (2011). Autonomous Campus Style Sheet. (In Persian)
Hoy, W & Miskel. (2005). Educational Administratio.U.S.A: Mc Graw Hill.
Hoy, W & Miskel. (2008). Educational Administratio.U.S.A: Mc Graw Hill.
Izadi Yazdan Abadi, Ahmad and Behrangi, Mohammad Reza (2006). surveying and analyzing organizational structure of Tarbiat Moallem University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 12 (2), 38-23.
King, N. & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research, London: Sage, 150.
Lerra. M. (2014). The Dynamics and Challenges of Distance Education at Private Higher Institutions in South Ethiopia,Educational Planning and Management, WolaitaSodo University. Ethiopia , (1) 3.
Levy, D.C. (2010). Viewing Private Higher Education: How Much, Where, Why and What? University at Albany, 622-627.
Manzini, Andrew (2006). Organizational Evolution Management. Translated by Ali Atafir et al., Tehran: Arkan Danesh Publishing.
Mehran, Golnar (2006). Investigating the process of empowerment of girls and women in Iranian educational system. Quarterly Journal of Education, 87, 59-92.
Mihm, J. L; Christoph, H; Wilkinson, D. & Huberman, B. A. (2010). Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations, Management Science,  (56), 831- 848.
Mir Kamali, Seyed Mohammad Hayat, Ali Asghar and Nosami, Karamat (2011). The Relationship between Organizational Creativity and Organic and Mechanical Structure of Schools: A Case Study of Secondary Schools. Management and Planning Quarterly in Educational Systems, 4 (7), 28-49.
  Montazer, Gholamali and Falahati, Negar (2015). Identifying the Future Uncertainties of Iranian Higher Education. 1st International Conference and 4th National Conference on Engineering Education, Shiraz University, 1-7.
Narimani, Meysam, Ghazi Noori, Seyyed Sepehr and Miramadi, Tahereh (2012). Extracting Political Implications of Evolutionary Approach to Science and Technology: A Thematic Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology, 5 (2), 1-16.
Pertusa-Ortega, E. M; Zaragoza-Saez, P. & Claver-Cortes, E. (2010). Can formalization complexity and centralization influence Knowledge performance? Journal of Business Research, (3) 63: Retrieved from ProQuest, 310 -325.
Rahimi, Sahar (2013). Strategic Analysis of Campus No. 2 of Shahid Beheshti University Using SWOT model, Thesis of Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University.
Rahnama, Seyed Ahmad (1999). Cultural Pathology. Ma'aref Magazine, 30, 25-32.
Rameshgar, Reyhaneh; Rajaee Pour, Saeed and Siyadat, Seyyed Ali (2014). Comparative Study of Organizational Structure of Isfahan University and Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Higher Education Letter, (2377), 77-98.
Robbins, S. P. )2003(. Organizational Behavior, 10th Ed.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice – Hall.
Robbins, S.P. & Coulther, M. (1996). Managment, 5thed, Newjersey: Prenticehall, 335.
Robbins, Stefan. P (2010). Organizational Behavior; Concepts, Theories and Applications. Thirteenth Edition, Volume 3, Tehran: Office of Cultural Studies.
Robbins, Stefan. P (2011). Organization Theory (Organizational Structure and Design). Tehran: Saffar Publishing.
Soleimani, Nader (2013). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Structure and Establishment of Total Quality Management (TQM) in Islamic Azad Universities in 10 countries. Management and Planning Quarterly in Educational Systems, 6 (10), 129-152.
Tilak, J.B.G (2008). Current Trends in Privat Higher Education In Asia. National University of Educational Planning and Administration.
Turkzadeh, Ja'far and Mohtaram, Masoumeh (1393). Investigating the relationship between the type of organizational structure of university and social capital of educational departments with educational satisfaction of Shiraz University students. Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 175-194.
Yadollahi Farsi, Jahangir; Zali, Mohammad Reza and Bagherifard, Morteza (2011). Identification the Structural Factors Affecting the Development of Academic Entrepreneurship; Case Study: Applied University. Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology, 4 (1), 17-32.
Yamanidouzi Sorkhi, Mohammad (2012). Quality in higher education. Tehran: SAMT publishing.
Yamnidouzi Sorkhabi, Mohammad (1983). Analysis of the educational system from the point of view of development. Quarterly journal of research and planning in higher education, 1(1), 61-84.
Zaker Salehi, Gholamreza (2009). Study of Legal and Managerial Dimensions of Universities Independence in Iran (Article 49 of the Fourth Schedule of the Law on Development and Development of Implementing Strategies for its Implementation). Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 53, 79-106.
Zaker Salehi, Gholamreza and Zaker Salehi, Amin (2010). A Study of the Viewpoints of Managers of Iranian Science Centers on Academic Independence in Iran. Iranian Journal of Higher Education Quarterly, 3 (1), 33-60.
Zarifian, Gholamreza (2007). Cultural Pathology of University. Social Sciences Quarterly. 10, 32-39.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار