<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Shahid Beheshti University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-5261</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A model for Improving Appointment and Promotion System of Staff and Line Managers in Education Department</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A model for Improving Appointment and Promotion System of Staff and Line Managers in Education Department</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>9</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>28</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">98443</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hosein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Piryaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student in Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mostafa</FirstName>
					<LastName>Niknami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This research, entitled &quot; A model for improving appointment and promotion system of staff and line managers in Education Department&#039;&#039;, examines the appointment of managers with regard to the effect of educational managers on productivity in Education Department.
In terms of purpose, this study is applied and in terms of data, it is quantitative. Based on performance type, it is a descriptive survey. The statistical population consists of 103772 line managers (school principals), 7380 staff managers (principals, deputies, Bureau officials), and 958196 teachers of different programs. 400 staff and line managers in addition to 400 teachers were selected as samples of the study by random multi-stage clustering using Morgan table. A researcher-made questionnaire was used for gathering data. It includes 95 closed-response questions. The reliability of the questionnaire is calculated 0/81.For data analysis, dependent t-test, Vilkakson and Mann-Whitney U tests and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were used. The findings of this study show that there is a significant difference between the existing criteria for managers&#039; appointment in Education Department with the desirable criteria from the view point of teachers and managers and there is a difference between the viewpoints of teachers and managers in terms of existing appointment criteria but they have similar viewpoints regarding desirable appointment criteria. According to the findings of this study, a model was proposed for the appointment and promotion of managers in Education Department.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This research, entitled &quot; A model for improving appointment and promotion system of staff and line managers in Education Department&#039;&#039;, examines the appointment of managers with regard to the effect of educational managers on productivity in Education Department.
In terms of purpose, this study is applied and in terms of data, it is quantitative. Based on performance type, it is a descriptive survey. The statistical population consists of 103772 line managers (school principals), 7380 staff managers (principals, deputies, Bureau officials), and 958196 teachers of different programs. 400 staff and line managers in addition to 400 teachers were selected as samples of the study by random multi-stage clustering using Morgan table. A researcher-made questionnaire was used for gathering data. It includes 95 closed-response questions. The reliability of the questionnaire is calculated 0/81.For data analysis, dependent t-test, Vilkakson and Mann-Whitney U tests and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were used. The findings of this study show that there is a significant difference between the existing criteria for managers&#039; appointment in Education Department with the desirable criteria from the view point of teachers and managers and there is a difference between the viewpoints of teachers and managers in terms of existing appointment criteria but they have similar viewpoints regarding desirable appointment criteria. According to the findings of this study, a model was proposed for the appointment and promotion of managers in Education Department.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Appointment of Managers</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Meritocracy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">the Promotion of Managers in Education Department</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">the Criteria for Managers' Appointment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Educational Managers</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://mpes.sbu.ac.ir/article_98443_4d4cabfd9183255d1f5dd55076741520.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
